United KingdomOfficial advice
NHS (England)
Plain-English overview of each vitamin and mineral, food sources, and the risks of taking too much, starting from the position that most people can get what they need from a varied diet.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- English
Note: Pages show 'last reviewed' August 2020 with review overdue; UK-focused.
Open the source →Source checked
United KingdomOfficial advice
NHS (England)
States who in the UK should consider vitamin D in autumn and winter and which groups are advised to take it all year round.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- English
Note: UK advice reflects UK latitude and sunlight; page last reviewed August 2020.
Open the source →Source checked
GermanyOfficial advice
Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR)
Federal risk assessor's Q&A on when supplements are unnecessary, which groups may benefit, and why supplements are not a substitute for a varied diet.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- German
Note: German only; dated December 2018.
Open the source →Source checked
GermanyOfficial advice
Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR)
Current German position on vitamin D: little added benefit for people who are already well supplied, which risk groups may benefit, and the risks of high-dose products.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- German
Note: German only; contains numeric reference values, which Spinal Frontiers should not reproduce.
Open the source →Source checked
GermanyOfficial advice
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung (DGE)
The German nutrition society's view that healthy people on a balanced diet generally do not need supplements, with the specific situations where it does recommend them.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- German
Note: German only; DGE is a scientific society (publicly funded) rather than a government body.
Open the source →Source checked
SwitzerlandOfficial advice
Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (BLV/FSVO/OSAV/USAV)
Swiss regulator's explanation that supplements are foods not medicines, that healthy people rarely need them, and what the risks are (no pre-market safety check, contaminants, interactions, dubious online sellers).
- Cost
- free
- Language
- German, French, Italian, English
Note: Switzerland does not require supplements to be notified to the authorities; control relies on self-checks by manufacturers and sellers plus cantonal spot checks (page last modified June 2025).
Open the source →Source checked
AustriaOfficial advice
Österreichische Agentur für Gesundheit und Ernährungssicherheit (AGES)
Austrian food-safety agency's view that supplements are unnecessary for the healthy general population, with official sampling results showing labelling and safety problems and advice on buying online.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- German
Note: German only; no date shown (sampling data to 2022).
Open the source →Source checked
European UnionOfficial advice
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
EFSA's scientific reference values for nutrients, including tolerable upper intake levels, with an interactive DRV Finder for health professionals.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- English
Note: Population reference values, not personal recommendations; contains numbers that Spinal Frontiers should not reproduce.
Open the source →Source checked
United StatesOfficial advice
US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Graded recommendation on whether supplements prevent cardiovascular disease and cancer in healthy adults: insufficient evidence for most, recommendation against beta-carotene and vitamin E.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- English
Note: US-focused; final statement June 2022; applies to community-dwelling, non-pregnant adults only.
Open the source →Source checked
United KingdomEvidence summaries
Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN), UK Government
The full scientific review behind current UK vitamin D advice, for readers who want the evidence base rather than the headline.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- English
Note: Technical report (2016, page updated 2023); concerns musculoskeletal health, not general disease prevention.
Open the source →Source checked
InternationalEvidence summaries
Cochrane
Example of an independent systematic review in plain language, showing how small and uncertain the benefits of a popular supplement are.
- Cost
- free (summary); full review may need subscription or national licence
- Language
- English, several translations
Note: Review published 2020 (PubMed 32114706)
Open the source →Source checked
InternationalEvidence summaries
Examine.com
Independent summaries of supplement research graded by outcome; states it is not affiliated with any supplement or food company, sells only information, and accepts no advertising or sponsorship.
- Cost
- freemium: much free content; Examine+ subscription for full database, guides and research feed
- Language
- English
Note: Commercial (subscription) business, not a public body; paid guides include dosing, which Spinal Frontiers should not reproduce.
Open the source →Source checked
United StatesEvidence summaries
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Academic, readable overview of what a good diet provides and where supplements may fill gaps.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- English
Note: US-focused; somewhat more open to multivitamins as a 'gap filler' than European bodies.
Open the source →Source checked
European UnionDatabases
European Commission (claims assessed by EFSA)
Lets readers check whether a health claim on a supplement label is authorised in the EU, and why many claims were rejected.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- English, other EU languages (about page)
Note: An authorised claim means a specific wording is permitted, not that a product is needed; search tool at https://ec.europa.eu/food/food-feed-portal/screen/health-claims/eu-register is a JavaScript app (not content-verified). Since Brexit the UK keeps its own GB register.
Open the source →Source checked
United StatesDatabases
NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS)
Detailed, referenced fact sheets on individual vitamins, minerals and botanicals, in separate consumer and health-professional versions, including known medicine interactions.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- English, Spanish (many sheets)
Note: US-focused; reference values are US ones and differ from UK/EU/DACH values.
Open the source →Source checked
United StatesDatabases
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK)
Evidence-based entries on herbs and supplements covering proven uses, adverse effects and herb-drug interactions, for patients and clinicians; also available as an app.
- Cost
- free (no cost stated; no login seen)
- Language
- English
Note: Cancer-centre perspective
Open the source →Source checked
United KingdomSafety & quality
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
Example of a UK regulator alert (August 2025) on a supplement found to contain an undeclared prescription-only medicine, with how to report side effects via the Yellow Card scheme.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- English
Note: A single alert naming a specific product; better presented as an example, alongside the Yellow Card reporting site (https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk), which the alert names for reporting side effects.
Open the source →Source checked
United KingdomSafety & quality
LGC Group
Batch-testing certification scheme for sports supplements against banned substances.
- Cost
- free to search (certification paid by brands)
- Language
- English
Note: Commercial certification scheme, not an endorsement; site does not state that residual risk remains; old URL informed-sport.com now redirects here; says nothing about efficacy.
Open the source →Source checked
GermanySafety & quality
Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR)
English explanation of how supplements are regulated in Germany (no pre-market registration, no binding maximum levels yet) and the BfR's role in assessing their safety.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- English, German
Note: Regulatory overview rather than advice on individual supplements; no date shown.
Open the source →Source checked
GermanySafety & quality
Verbraucherzentralen (German consumer advice centres)
Independent consumer site that checks advertised supplement claims and lists current warnings and recalls; includes a clear page on supplement-medicine interactions and effects on lab tests.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- German
Note: German only; consumer organisation, not a regulator. Interactions page: https://www.verbraucherzentrale.de/wissen/lebensmittel/nahrungsergaenzungsmittel/wechselwirkungen-mit-medikamenten-10595 (updated February 2026).
Open the source →Source checked
GermanySafety & quality
Kölner Liste (operated by HEIMSPIELE GmbH & Co. KG; partners include NADA)
Database of supplement products tested for doping substances; useful for anyone subject to anti-doping rules.
- Cost
- free to search (testing paid by manufacturers)
- Language
- German, English, Spanish
Note: Certification scheme, not an endorsement: states it is 'keine Empfehlung' to use any supplement; testing reduces but cannot exclude contamination risk; says nothing about efficacy.
Open the source →Source checked
European UnionSafety & quality
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
EFSA's risk assessment of caffeine from all sources including supplements and energy drinks, including effects on sleep: directly relevant to shift and night workers.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- English
Note: Based on a 2015 opinion; excludes people with medical conditions or on medicines; contains numeric intake levels.
Open the source →Source checked
United StatesSafety & quality
NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS)
Short primer on benefits, risks and interactions (e.g. vitamin K and warfarin, St John's wort) and on telling every clinician what you take.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- English, Spanish
Note: US regulatory context; updated January 2023.
Open the source →Source checked
United StatesSafety & quality
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH, NIH)
Concise safety guidance: interactions, risks around surgery and anaesthesia, 'natural' not meaning safe, and products found to contain undeclared drugs.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- English, Spanish
Note: US-focused; last updated January 2019. Related herb pages (e.g. St John's wort, updated May 2025) are more current.
Open the source →Source checked
United StatesSafety & quality
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Explains that manufacturers, not the FDA, are responsible for checking a supplement's safety and labelling before sale, with the FDA acting only once products are on the market; links to recalls and safety alerts and to an FDA directory of selected supplement ingredients.
- Cost
- free
- Language
- English
Note: US regulator
Open the source →Source checked